|
Post by rushil on Apr 5, 2016 5:09:56 GMT
4. Why do we have all these barriers to nonmonotonic change? Why isn't it the case that we can just update our knowledge smoothly in the face of more (or better) information?
I think it's damage control by your brain. Whenever a new information doesn't fit into the existing model, instead of throwing you/your body into a state of chaos, the brain decides to maintain order by basing it on quantity of information. I also believe that it is not as simple as just looking at the amount of information, but something along the lines of a weighted sum of quantity and quality. When a tipping point is reached in terms of new information accumulation, then your brain switches direction. Therefore, the transition doesn't seem smooth even though the new information was accumulating inside your brain.
|
|
|
Post by Anna on Apr 5, 2016 10:55:03 GMT
To answer question 1: I'm taking a drawing class right now. Arguably, a lot of the learning has been procedural, but I've also experienced non-monotonic changes in my knowledge of visual perception. Or at least, I think it was non-monotonic. I had actually partially learned some of the concepts before from random readings in a psych book I found about human perception. However, until this class, I don't think my knowledge representation of human visual perception had actually changed. Prior to this class, on a surface level, I could accept that sure, we don't actually see things the way I think/feel I see them, but my mental model of vision hadn't actually changed; I was not open to non-monotonic change. So for me, I really needed that relevatory moment, aka needed to viscerally feel understand how perception worked before I was willing to let go of my previous concept of vision.
|
|
judy
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by judy on Apr 5, 2016 13:01:49 GMT
on non-monotonic learning...
In my experience (as Xu says), it is very important to let people explain their existing mental model. To listen. To draw it out, and in my practice, often to act it out. And then to let them hear/see how other people reason through the same situation from a different perspective. If the reasoning is evident AND can be experienced in a powerful way, belief change is possible. People can identify commonalities, find connections, an pin point more narrowly where their belief departs from someone else's. Social pressures and empathy also play a huge role in belief change--I'm not sure that that is represented here.
|
|